We correct on the page, keep the old wording visible in the note, and add a permanent row here. We do not silently edit, we do not delete an article to make an error disappear, and we do not remove old rows.
Newest first. Editorial fixes that do not change meaning are not logged.
Correction
The article said something untrue. The text is fixed, a note is appended, and the row is logged. On a safety claim the note stays at the top of the article for 30 days.
Clarification
The fact was right but readable the wrong way. Rewritten, noted, logged. Most of these come from readers telling us how they read a sentence.
Update
New evidence, a new statute, or a retraction of something we cited. The article is revised and the check date advanced. Turnaround target is two working days on Safety and Law, five elsewhere.
12 Aug 2026CorrectionWhat the Rat Studies Actually ShowWe described a 2018 rodent study as measuring blood pressure continuously; it sampled at fixed intervals. The onset-timing paragraph was rewritten and the claim regraded from Supported to Contested.S. Aydın
29 Jul 2026UpdateIs Mad Honey Legal? CanadaAgency guidance reissued June 2026. Novel-food classification wording aligned to the new text; check date advanced.R. Mehta
16 Jul 2026ClarificationMad Honey and Blood PressureA sentence comparing two case series could be read as implying a threshold amount. Rewritten. No quantity was stated in either version.M. Lindqvist
3 Jul 2026CorrectionApis Laboriosa: The Himalayan Cliff BeeNesting altitude range was given from a secondary source and was too narrow at the lower bound. Corrected against the original survey.P. Gurung
21 Jun 2026ClarificationMad Honey vs KratomThe comparison table's onset row implied direct comparability between two differently-measured literatures. A caveat row was added above it.I. Thapa
9 Jun 2026CorrectionXenophon and the Retreat of the Ten ThousandBook and chapter reference for the Anabasis passage was wrong. Corrected, and the translation used is now named inline.P. Gurung
28 May 2026UpdateMedication InteractionsRewritten after clinical review to remove drug-class generalisations that were not directly evidenced, and to route the whole question to a pharmacist or prescriber.T. Weber
14 May 2026ClarificationHow to Read a Mad Honey Lab ReportA worked example of a report layout was mistaken by several readers for an endorsement of a testing method. Reframed and relabelled.I. Thapa
Show earlier corrections, 2025 Eight entries shown. The 2025 rows load as their own page so the archive stays linkable without JavaScript.
Tell us we got something wrong
Give us the article, the paragraph, and what you think the right answer is. If you have a source, that speeds things up enormously. We reply to every message that names a specific claim, usually within five working days, and we log every correction including the ones that make us look bad.
One email a month, when there is something worth saying.
New articles, changes to any of the nine legal-status pages, and a short note on any study worth reading. If a month passes with nothing substantial, you get nothing: we would rather skip than pad. No sponsors, no seller mentions, no third-party sharing.